Overview

Prices are in Australian Dollars. close

Hotel Résidence La Concorde

5, rue Cambon, 75001 Paris, Île-de-France, France
+33 1 42 60 38 89

Call

+33 1 42 60 38 89

Overall guest ratings

7.0/10 Good
based on 932 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.5
  • 8.1
  • 4.9
  • 3.1

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located between the place de la Concorde and the place Vendôme, the 3-star Residence hotel Concorde has 25 rooms all equipped with air-conditioned, soundproof and decorated in a simple way to assure you a Parisian stay of the most pleasant. The Cambon Street is famous for Coco Chanel: symbol of the French elegance. The hotel is just a step from luxury shops. The Musée du Louvre and Champs-Elysées are accessible on foot from the hotel. The subway station Concorde les only 180 meters, which will grant you to visit all the famous sites of Paris. The line 1 gives a direct access in the business quarter the La Defense as well as to the Palais des Congrès. The breakfast is served every morning in the restaurant or on request in your room. The Residence La Concorde has a reception opened 24 hours a day and is equipped with an elevator.

    Less More
    FastBooking Direct

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Business centre
    • Concierge service
    • Room service
    • Cable or satellite TV
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Pets not allowed
    • Storage available
    • Terrace/Patio
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 932 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.2 "92% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.1 "City centre within easy reach, said 91%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      9.3 "93% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.8 "88% said the reception staff was great."
    • 6.9 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.1 "Average cleanliness."
      5.5 "Only 55% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 4.9 "Disappointing food."
    • 3.1 "Awful rooms."
      2.1 "79% complained about the bathroom."
      0.2 "98% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.3 "57% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      0.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 93%."
      4.5 "55% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.6 "94% had problems with the shower."
      0.6 "94% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.8 "62% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.4 "Terrible amenities."
      1.9 "81% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.9 "91% complained about the elevator."
      1.2 "88% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.5 "For 95%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      2.5 "75% didn't like the architecture."
    • 1.1 "Horrible vibe."
      0.5 "95% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      0.5 "For 95%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      3.3 "67% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
      2.9 "71% criticized the plain hotel."
    • 1.0 "Disappointing internet connection."
      0.9 "91% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    based on 391 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      9.3 "93% found the staff to be very friendly."
      9.0 "90% said the reception staff was great."
    • 6.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.1 "Food is average."
    • 5.0 "Average cleanliness."
      5.4 "Only 54% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 2.7 "Awful rooms."
      2.2 "78% complained about the bathroom."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      4.1 "59% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.2 "98% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.7 "93% had problems with the shower."
      0.6 "Air conditioning was criticized by 94%."
      4.3 "57% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.6 "Terrible amenities."
      2.2 "78% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.8 "92% complained about the elevator."
      1.5 "85% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.4 "For 96%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 1.0 "Horrible vibe."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      0.4 "For 96%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 0.9 "Disappointing internet connection."
      0.9 "91% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 288 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 8.3 "Great service."
      7.9 "79% thought the service was very professional."
    • 6.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.3 "Average cleanliness."
      5.8 "Only 58% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      0.2 "98% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.3 "67% found problems with the furniture."
      0.6 "Air conditioning was criticized by 94%."
    • 2.1 "Terrible amenities."
      1.7 "83% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.9 "91% complained about the elevator."
      1.0 "90% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.0 "Disappointing internet connection."
      0.7 "93% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 0.9 "Horrible vibe."
      0.5 "95% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    based on 251 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.2 "Great service."
      9.0 "90% said the reception staff was great."
      8.4 "84% thought the service was very professional."
    • 7.2 "Good breakfast."
    • 5.1 "Average cleanliness."
      5.5 "Only 55% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 3.4 "Rooms are not good."
      2.1 "79% complained about the bathroom."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      4.5 "55% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 93%."
      4.5 "55% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.3 "Terrible amenities."
      1.9 "81% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.9 "91% complained about the elevator."
      1.1 "89% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.2 "Horrible vibe."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 1.0 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.1 "89% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close