Overview

Prices are in Australian Dollars. close

Linné Hostel

Vegagatan 22, 413 09 Gothenburg, Vastra Gotaland, Sweden
+46 3112 1060

$60+

Overall guest ratings

7.1/10 Good
based on 1,476 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.1
  • 7.4
  • 4.9
  • 4.4

Good to know

  • Close to public transport

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Linné Hostel is located within the Linnéstaden district of central Gothenburg. It offers a communal kitchen with a stove and a fridge, free WiFi and free afternoon coffee and cookies. All rooms at Linné Hostel are simply furnished and include access to shared bathroom facilities. Many rooms have a TV. The surrounding neighbourhood provides a wide variety of restaurants and nightlife options. Gothenburg Central Station is an 11-minute direct bus ride away. Gothenburg Botanical Gardens is 0.9 miles away.

    Less More
    booking.com

    Amenities

    • Internet
    • No smoking
    • Parking
    • Storage available
    • Free Wi-Fi
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    based on 1,473 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.2 "92% liked the proximity to shopping."
      8.8 "City centre within easy reach, said 88%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      8.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 80%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 7.4 "Good service."
      9.6 "96% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.8 "Housekeeping was great, according to 78%."
    • 6.8 "Internet is average."
      6.0 "60% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 6.2 "Average cleanliness."
      5.6 "Only 56% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 4.9 "Bad amenities."
      4.7 "53% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 4.4 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.5 "65% complained about the bathroom."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      4.9 "51% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      4.2 "58% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.1 "79% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.1 "79% found problems with the furniture."
      1.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 85%."
      4.5 "55% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.5 "75% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.4 "86% were disappointed with the minibar."
    • 4.0 "Not very comfortable."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      4.0 "60% thought it was too noisy."
      1.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 85%."
      2.5 "75% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.8 "Horrible vibe."
      0.0 "100% criticized the plain hotel."
      3.2 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 68%."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 456 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
    • 8.3 "Good value."
    • 7.4 "Good service."
      9.7 "97% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.8 "Internet is average."
    • 4.6 "Bad amenities."
      4.4 "56% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      4.3 "57% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.8 "62% complained about the bathroom."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      1.9 "81% found problems with the furniture."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
      4.3 "57% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      3.7 "63% thought it was too noisy."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 486 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      7.2 "Great parking, according to 72%."
    • 7.6 "Good service."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.1 "Housekeeping was great, according to 81%."
    • 5.4 "Average cleanliness."
    • 3.9 "Not very comfortable."
      4.6 "54% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      4.3 "57% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.4 "Rooms are not good."
      4.6 "54% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.2 "68% complained about the bathroom."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were dirty."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      4.5 "55% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      2.0 "80% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.9 "61% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.2 "78% found problems with the furniture."
      4.5 "55% thought the tv was sub-standard."

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 530 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      8.7 "City centre within easy reach, said 87%."
    • 7.4 "Good service."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.5 "Internet is average."
      5.8 "58% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 6.4 "Average cleanliness."
      5.8 "Only 58% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 4.3 "Rooms are not good."
      4.6 "54% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.6 "64% complained about the bathroom."
      4.2 "58% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      2.1 "79% found problems with the furniture."
      2.4 "76% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 4.0 "Not very comfortable."
      4.6 "54% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.0 "60% thought it was too noisy."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
    • 2.8 "Horrible vibe."
      3.1 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 69%."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Economy Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for budget travelers.
    Good to know
    "Close to public transport"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention:

    Photos
    Map

    Map