Overview

Prices are in Australian Dollars. close

×
Your browser will soon be unsupported by KAYAK.
Update now and keep on travelling with us!

Ryokan Ohto

Hitosujime-minami-sagaru Nanajo-Kamogawa-higashi Higashiyama, Kyoto 605-0994, Japan
+81 755 417 803

$53+

Fri 9/12 Check in
Sat 10/12 Check out

Overall guest ratings

5.5/10 OK
based on 1,001 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.1
  • 3.4
  • 3.1
  • 2.5

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located in Kyoto (Higashiyama), Ryokan Ohto is minutes from Sanjusangendo Temple and Kyoto National Museum. This ryokan is close to Kiyomizu Temple and Nijo Castle.

    Rooms

    Make yourself at home in one of the 12 air-conditioned rooms featuring refrigerators. Complimentary wireless Internet access is available to keep you connected. Bathrooms have complimentary toiletries and hair dryers.

    Amenities

    Take in the views from a rooftop terrace and make use of amenities such as complimentary wireless Internet access and tour/ticket assistance.

    Business, Other Amenities

    Featured amenities include dry cleaning/laundry services and laundry facilities.

    Less More Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • Parking
    • Air-conditioned
    • Concierge service
    • Laundry facilities
    • Laundry service
    • Pets not allowed
    • Terrace/Patio
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    5.5 OK
    based on 1,001 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
    • 5.3 "Internet is average."
    • 3.4 "Service is below average."
    • 3.1 "Quite uncomfortable."
    • 2.5 "Awful rooms."
    • 2.4 "Terrible amenities."
    • 2.3 "Horrible vibe."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    5.4 OK
    based on 490 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      9.0 "90% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.4 "94% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 5.4 "Internet is average."
    • 5.0 "Average value."
    • 3.7 "Service is below average."
      4.3 "57% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the management."
      3.6 "64% thought the service was unprofessional."
    • 3.0 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.4 "76% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.5 "Horrible vibe."
      1.3 "87% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      5.0 "50% thought the atmosphere was somewhat friendly."
    • 2.1 "Awful rooms."
      1.1 "89% complained about the bathroom."
      1.3 "87% said rooms were dirty."
      2.4 "76% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.5 "95% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.6 "For 84%, the rooms looked old."
      1.9 "81% found problems with the furniture."
    • 2.0 "Terrible amenities."
      1.9 "81% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% complained about the elevator."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    5.4 OK
    based on 220 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.1 "91% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.4 "94% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.1 "Easily accessible by car, said 91%."
    • 3.8 "Service is below average."
      4.8 "52% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      4.3 "57% thought the service was unprofessional."
      2.4 "Bad housekeeping, according to 76%."
    • 3.1 "Quite uncomfortable."
      1.9 "81% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were small."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.4 "Awful rooms."
      1.9 "81% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.2 "88% complained about the bathroom."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were small."
      1.4 "86% said rooms were dirty."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.2 "For 88%, the rooms looked old."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 2.1 "Horrible vibe."
      1.0 "90% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 2.0 "Terrible amenities."
      2.0 "80% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% complained about the elevator."

    Overall rating

    6.0 OK
    based on 290 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 5.7 "Internet is average."
    • 3.3 "Not very comfortable."
      2.7 "73% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
    • 3.2 "Service is unsatisfactory."
      4.4 "56% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the management."
    • 3.0 "Terrible amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
      1.8 "82% said rooms were dirty."
      1.7 "83% complained about the bathroom."
      2.7 "73% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
      1.4 "86% found problems with the furniture."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 2.4 "Horrible vibe."
      1.6 "84% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.9 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 61%."
    View all review categories
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close
    Would you like to save as your currency permanently or for this visit only?
    Close