Overview

Prices are in Australian Dollars. close

×
Your browser will soon be unsupported by KAYAK.
Update now and keep on travelling with us!

Insurance

No.69, Changjiang Road, Xuanwu Area, Nanjing 210005, China
+86 258 471 5888

$51+

Overall guest ratings

8.0/10 Good
based on 1,651 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.6
  • 8.9
  • 4.0
  • 3.2

Nearby

    show all

    About

    The Insurance Mansion (Baoxian Dasha) is located only 0.7 km from the bustling city center close to Nanjing popular sights like the Confucius Temple and Presidential Palace as well as many shopping centers. Diners may enjoy food at the on-site Chinese restaurant one of private dining rooms or the cafeteria. This Nanjing hotel has variously-sized meeting rooms the larger of which can accommodate 250-300. During their spare time guests may get pampered at the beauty salon play tennis or exercise body at the gym. Those looking to socialize may head to the café.

    Less More
    CtripApac
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    8.0 Good
    based on 1,651 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 8.9 "Food is delicious."
    • 7.5 "High value."
    • 5.4 "Service is ok."
      5.4 "Only 54% thought the service was professional."
    • 5.3 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      3.7 "63% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.0 "100% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.1 "79% had problems with the shower."
      1.1 "89% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      1.4 "86% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.0 "100% found problems with the furniture."
    • 3.2 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.4 "76% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.0 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 1.8 "Terrible amenities."
      1.7 "83% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.0 "100% complained about the elevator."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    8.3 Excellent
    based on 231 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.6 "Easily accessible by car, said 96%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.7 "Food is delicious."
    • 6.0 "Service is ok."
    • 5.6 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.5 "Rooms are not good."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      0.1 "For 99%, the rooms looked old."
    • 1.8 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 1.7 "Terrible amenities."
      1.8 "82% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    8.2 Excellent
    based on 544 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 9.0 "Food is to die for."
    • 7.4 "High value."
    • 6.9 "Average cleanliness."
      6.9 "Only 69% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 5.5 "Service is ok."
      5.7 "Only 57% thought the service was professional."
    • 4.7 "Not very comfortable."
      3.7 "63% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.5 "55% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.6 "Rooms are not good."
      2.2 "78% complained about the bathroom."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      0.0 "100% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.7 "63% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.7 "83% had problems with the shower."
      4.5 "55% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.9 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.2 "78% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 1.8 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 1.6 "Terrible amenities."
      1.5 "85% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.8 Good
    based on 792 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 8.9 "Food is delicious."
    • 7.6 "High value."
    • 6.6 "Average cleanliness."
      6.5 "Only 65% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 5.2 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.8 "Not very comfortable."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 3.9 "Rooms are not good."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      0.0 "100% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 3.3 "Internet is poor."
      2.8 "72% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.1 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 1.9 "Terrible amenities."
      1.8 "82% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    8.4 Excellent
    based on 82 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
    • 7.7 "High value."
    • 5.6 "Service is ok."
    • 3.9 "Rooms are not good."
    • 2.5 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 2.1 "Terrible amenities."
      1.8 "82% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    data provided by TrustYou

    Map

    Map

    Close
    Would you like to save as your currency permanently or for this visit only?
    Close