Overview

Prices are in Australian Dollars. close

Hotel Giulio Cesare

Via Rovello 10, 20121 Milan, Lombardy, Italy
+39 027 200 3915

$90+

Overall guest ratings

6.7/10 Good
based on 1,709 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.7
  • 7.5
  • 4.6
  • 4.1

Nearby

    show all

    About

    GIULIO CESARE is 3 star Hotel located Central. This Hotel's room amenities include Television, Air conditioning, Mini bar, Hairdryer; This Hotel's facilities and services include medium sized lobby, Elevator/lift;

    Less show all
    HanaTour

    Amenities

    • Internet
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Express check out
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Continental breakfast
    • Storage available
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    Less show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 1,709 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      9.5 "95% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      8.3 "Easily accessible by car, said 83%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      7.5 "Great parking, according to 75%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      8.7 "87% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.1 "71% said the reception staff was great."
      7.2 "72% thought the service was very professional."
      8.6 "Management was excellent, said 86%."
    • 5.5 "Internet is average."
      5.3 "53% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 4.6 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.1 "Not very clean."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      4.3 "57% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.6 "64% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 2.8 "Quite uncomfortable."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      4.8 "52% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.8 "52% thought it was too noisy."
    • 2.6 "Awful rooms."
      1.8 "82% complained about the bathroom."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.8 "52% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      0.6 "94% had problems with the shower."
      1.1 "89% found problems with the furniture."
      4.3 "57% said the bathroom was dirty."
      4.7 "53% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 2.0 "Terrible amenities."
      2.0 "80% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.0 "90% complained about the elevator."
      1.1 "89% thought the facilities needed updating."
      2.7 "73% found the grounds unpleasant."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 803 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.6 "96% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      7.1 "Great parking, according to 71%."
    • 7.3 "Good service."
      8.6 "86% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.5 "75% said the reception staff was great."
      7.1 "71% thought the service was very professional."
    • 5.4 "Internet is average."
      5.2 "52% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 4.6 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.0 "Not very clean."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were dirty."
      4.2 "58% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.9 "61% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.0 "Quite uncomfortable."
      1.2 "88% said rooms were small."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.6 "54% thought it was too noisy."
    • 2.8 "Awful rooms."
      1.9 "81% complained about the bathroom."
      1.2 "88% said rooms were small."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.0 "90% found problems with the furniture."
      4.2 "58% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.8 "92% had problems with the shower."
    • 1.9 "Terrible amenities."
      1.9 "81% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.1 "89% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.1 "89% complained about the elevator."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 102 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.3 "93% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 7.3 "Good service."
      8.5 "85% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 4.2 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.1 "Not very clean."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
    • 2.8 "Quite uncomfortable."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.7 "93% said rooms were small."
    • 2.5 "Awful rooms."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.6 "84% complained about the bathroom."
      0.7 "93% said rooms were small."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
    • 2.3 "Terrible amenities."
      2.4 "76% thought the building wasn't nice."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 803 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.6 "96% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.3 "93% liked the proximity to shopping."
      8.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 80%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      8.4 "84% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.0 "70% said the reception staff was great."
    • 5.2 "Internet is average."
    • 4.6 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.8 "Not very clean."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were dirty."
      3.7 "63% thought it was rather dirty."
      4.2 "58% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.5 "Terrible amenities."
      2.4 "76% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.1 "89% complained about the elevator."
      1.1 "89% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.1 "Awful rooms."
      1.7 "83% complained about the bathroom."
      0.6 "94% said rooms were small."
      0.5 "95% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.7 "93% had problems with the shower."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      4.5 "55% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.3 "87% found problems with the furniture."
      4.2 "58% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.0 "Quite uncomfortable."
      0.6 "94% said rooms were small."
      0.5 "95% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.5 "55% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.6 "54% thought it was too noisy."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    All reviews
    Find reviews that mention:
    More
    Map

    Map