Overview

Prices are in Australian Dollars. close

Kishu Tetsudo Nagoya Sakae Hotel

3-7-13 Nishiki, Naka-ku, Nagoya 460-0003, Japan
+81 529 510 841

$55+

Overall guest ratings

7.2/10 Good
based on 2,270 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.6
  • 8.1
  • 4.4
  • 4.2

Nearby

    show all

    About

    When you stay at Kishu Tetsudo Nagoya Sakae Hotel, you'll be within a 10-minute drive of Nagoya Castle and Nagoya City Science Museum. Free perks include full breakfast and WiFi. All rooms feature refrigerators and bathrobes.

    Less show all
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Complimentary breakfast
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • Air-conditioned
    • Laundry service
    • Safe
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Concierge service
    • Pets not allowed
    • Parking (surcharge)
    Less show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    based on 2,270 reviews
    • 8.6 "Very nice wellness & sports facilities."
    • 8.1 "Location is great."
      9.1 "91% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      7.8 "78% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.8 "City centre within easy reach, said 98%."
      9.5 "Near to public transport, according to 95%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      7.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 70%."
    • 7.7 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.4 "Good service."
      7.4 "74% said the reception staff was great."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
      10.0 "100% said the booking process went smoothly."
      7.5 "75% said the recreation staff was great."
    • 5.4 "Internet is average."
    • 4.4 "Rooms are not good."
      3.1 "69% complained about the bathroom."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were small."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were dirty."
      0.8 "92% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.5 "65% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.6 "For 74%, the rooms looked old."
      1.3 "87% had problems with the shower."
      0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 89%."
      4.7 "53% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      4.2 "58% were unhappy with the view."
      2.0 "80% found problems with the furniture."
    • 4.2 "Not very comfortable."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were small."
      2.8 "72% thought it was too noisy."
      3.5 "65% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 89%."
    • 3.3 "Not very clean."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were dirty."
      0.8 "92% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.3 "67% said that wellness & sports facilities were unclean."
    • 3.1 "Horrible vibe."
      1.6 "84% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      4.1 "For 59%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 476 reviews
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      8.1 "81% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.5 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.4 "Good service."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 3.9 "Rooms are not good."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      2.7 "73% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 88%."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      3.0 "70% thought it was too noisy."
      1.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 88%."
    • 3.2 "Horrible vibe."
      1.7 "83% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.1 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.7 "73% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% said the bathroom was dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 431 reviews
    • 8.1 "Location is great."
      9.2 "92% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.1 "81% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.9 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.3 "Good service."
    • 4.4 "Bad amenities."
      4.7 "53% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.7 "93% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
      2.9 "71% said rooms were small."
      2.8 "72% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were dirty."
      2.9 "71% said rooms were small."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      0.7 "93% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.9 "Horrible vibe."
      1.6 "84% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 2.7 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% said the bathroom was dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 431 reviews
    • 8.9 "Good value."
    • 8.7 "Location is great."
      8.9 "89% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.9 "City centre within easy reach, said 99%."
      8.1 "81% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      7.4 "74% said the reception staff was great."
    • 5.4 "Rooms are ok."
      6.8 "Beds were acceptable for 68%."
    • 4.3 "Not very clean."
      4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.3 "Vibe wasn't good."
      2.0 "80% criticized the unstylish hotel."

    Overall rating

    7.4 Good
    based on 930 reviews
    • 8.6 "Location is great."
      9.2 "92% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.1 "81% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.9 "City centre within easy reach, said 99%."
    • 7.8 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.2 "Good service."
      7.6 "76% said the reception staff was great."
      9.6 "96% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 5.3 "Internet is average."
    • 4.6 "Rooms are not good."
      3.5 "65% complained about the bathroom."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were small."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were dirty."
      3.5 "65% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.8 "92% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.3 "For 77%, the rooms looked old."
      1.2 "88% had problems with the shower."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 4.5 "Not very comfortable."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were small."
      2.8 "72% thought it was too noisy."
      3.5 "65% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 4.0 "Bad amenities."
      4.3 "57% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.6 "94% thought the facilities needed updating."
      3.9 "61% found the grounds unpleasant."
    • 3.7 "Not very clean."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were dirty."
      0.8 "92% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.9 "Horrible vibe."
      1.3 "87% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    data provided by TrustYou
    Photos
    Map

    Map