Overview

Prices are in Australian Dollars. close

Jinjiang Inn Suzhou Liu Garden

No.2 Liuyuan Rd., Suzhou 215008, China
+86 512 6533 1266

$30+

Overall guest ratings

8.4/10 Excellent
based on 1,549 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.4
  • 8.1
  • 4.7
  • 4.6

Good to know

  • Good accessibility by car
  • Wonderful sightseeing

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located in Suzhou City Centre, this hotel is within a 10-minute walk of Shantang Street and Cloud Capped Peak. JiangNan ChuanWenHua BoLanGuan and Shantang Diaohualou are also within 15 minutes.

    Less More
    Expedia

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Business centre
    • Laundry service
    • Restaurant
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Free parking
    • Storage available
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Laundry facilities
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Free Internet
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    8.4 Excellent
    based on 1,549 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 97%."
      9.7 "97% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      8.4 "84% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.1 "81% thought the service was very professional."
      9.3 "93% were happy with the shuttle service."
    • 7.2 "Good breakfast."
    • 5.2 "Vibe was decent."
    • 4.7 "Rooms are not good."
      2.1 "79% complained about the bathroom."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      1.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 86%."
      0.3 "97% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.7 "93% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.0 "100% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.0 "100% had problems with the shower."
    • 4.6 "Internet is poor."
      4.4 "56% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.6 "Not very comfortable."
      2.4 "76% thought it was too noisy."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 86%."
      0.7 "93% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.5 "95% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.4 "86% complained about the elevator."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    8.4 Excellent
    based on 325 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 7.9 "Good service."
    • 4.7 "Rooms are not good."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 4.7 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.4 "96% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.6 "Not very comfortable."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 3.1 "Terrible amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."

    Overall rating

    8.2 Excellent
    based on 805 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 97%."
      9.6 "96% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.8 "Good service."
      8.8 "88% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 7.6 "Good breakfast."
    • 5.0 "Internet is average."
      4.8 "52% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 4.9 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.4 "96% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      3.3 "67% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.1 "79% complained about the bathroom."
      1.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 85%."
    • 3.4 "Not very comfortable."
      2.2 "78% thought it was too noisy."
      3.3 "67% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 85%."
    • 3.1 "Terrible amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    8.7 Excellent
    based on 325 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
    • 4.8 "Rooms are not good."
      2.7 "73% complained about the bathroom."
    • 3.6 "Not very comfortable."
      2.6 "74% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.1 "Terrible amenities."
      2.8 "72% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.6 "94% thought the facilities needed updating."

    Overall rating

    8.2 Excellent
    based on 92 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 97%."
    • 8.2 "Great service."
    • 7.9 "High value."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      2.9 "71% thought the building wasn't nice."
    Hotel type
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    Good to know
    "Good accessibility by car"
    "Wonderful sightseeing"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close