Overview

Prices are in Australian Dollars. close

Flexstay Inn Higashi-Jujo

2-10-2 Naka-jujo Kita-ku, Tokyo, Japan
+81 339 053 631

$62+

Overall guest ratings

6.8/10 Good
based on 1,766 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.2
  • 7.0
  • 4.6
  • 3.6

Good to know

  • Train station is close

Nearby

    show all

    About

    【Access from nearby stations】 2 minutes walk from the South exit of Higashi-Jujo Station on the JR Keihin-Tohoku Line. 7 minutes walk from the North exit of Jujo Station on the JR Saikyo Line.

    More hotel details about Flexstay Inn Higashi-Jujo

    Flexstay Inn Higashi-Jujo Prices:

    $47 - $112 (Based on average prices for a Standard Room)

    Flexstay Inn Higashi-Jujo Rooms:

    88 rooms

    Other names used to reference this hotel:

    • Flexstay Inn Higashi-Jujo Tokyo
    • Flexstay Inn Higashi-Jujo Tokyo Tokyo Prefecture
    • Flexstay Inn Higashi-Jujo TYO
    • Flexstay Inn Higashi-Jujo Hotel
    • Flexstay Inn Higashi-Jujo Hotel Tokyo
    • Flexstay Inn Higashi-Jujo Hotel TYO
    • Flexstay Inn Higashi-Jujo Hotel Tokyo (TYO)
    Less More
    FastBooking Direct

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • Air-conditioned
    • Storage available
    • Laundry facilities
    • Kitchen/Kitchenette
    • Pets not allowed
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 1,766 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "99% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.5 "Easily accessible by car, said 95%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 7.0 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.0 "Good service."
      6.7 "67% said the reception staff was ok."
      6.2 "Only 62% thought the service was professional."
    • 4.6 "Internet is poor."
      4.2 "58% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.6 "Bad amenities."
      4.0 "60% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.9 "91% found the grounds unpleasant."
      0.0 "100% didn't like the smoking area."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
      0.7 "93% said rooms were small."
      2.2 "78% said rooms were dirty."
      3.3 "67% complained about the bathroom."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      1.6 "84% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.2 "98% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.6 "64% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.1 "79% found problems with the furniture."
      1.9 "81% had problems with the shower."
      3.3 "67% were disappointed with the minibar."
    • 2.4 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.2 "78% said rooms were dirty."
      3.7 "63% thought it was rather dirty."
      1.6 "84% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.4 "Quite uncomfortable."
      0.7 "93% said rooms were small."
      0.2 "98% criticized the small bathroom."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    based on 1,130 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.7 "97% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.6 "Easily accessible by car, said 96%."
    • 6.8 "Service is ok."
      6.4 "64% said the reception staff was ok."
      5.9 "Only 59% thought the service was professional."
    • 4.5 "Internet is poor."
      4.1 "59% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.6 "64% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.2 "98% thought the facilities needed updating."
      4.8 "For 52%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 2.9 "Awful rooms."
      0.4 "96% said rooms were small."
      2.0 "80% said rooms were dirty."
      3.6 "64% complained about the bathroom."
      0.6 "For 94%, the rooms looked old."
      1.8 "82% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.2 "98% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.8 "82% found problems with the furniture."
      2.4 "76% had problems with the shower."
      4.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 57%."
      4.3 "57% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 2.6 "Quite uncomfortable."
      0.4 "96% said rooms were small."
      0.2 "98% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 57%."
    • 2.2 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.0 "80% said rooms were dirty."
      3.7 "63% thought it was rather dirty."
      1.8 "82% said the bathroom was dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 282 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "97% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.6 "Easily accessible by car, said 96%."
    • 7.0 "Good service."
      6.3 "Only 63% thought the service was professional."
    • 4.4 "Internet is poor."
      4.0 "60% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.9 "Bad amenities."
      4.2 "58% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 2.7 "Awful rooms."
      0.6 "94% said rooms were small."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      2.0 "80% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
    • 2.3 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.0 "80% said rooms were dirty."
    • 2.2 "Horrible vibe."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 35 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "99% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 8.7 "Good value."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were small."
    • 2.4 "Quite uncomfortable."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were small."

    Overall rating

    6.5 Good
    based on 317 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "98% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.2 "Good service."
      7.0 "70% said the reception staff was great."
      9.1 "91% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 4.3 "Internet is poor."
      3.9 "61% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.7 "63% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.1 "Awful rooms."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were small."
      2.2 "78% said rooms were dirty."
      3.0 "70% complained about the bathroom."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      3.2 "68% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 2.4 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.2 "78% said rooms were dirty."
      3.4 "66% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 2.3 "Quite uncomfortable."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were small."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    Good to know
    "Train station is close"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close